Multiple commentaries on our theoretical paper about a new view of motor imagery

Special issue on "Special Issue on the Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Motor Imagery Practice” in Psychological Research

Hommel, B. Exorcizing the homunculus from ideomotor/simulation theory: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022), Frank et al. (2023), and Rieger et al. (2023) Link

O’Shea, H., Bek, J. The complex interplay between perception, cognition, and action: a commentary on Bach et al. 2022. Link

Grosprêtre, S. Motor imagery from brain to muscle: a commentary on Bach et al., (2022).Psychological Research 88, 1805–1807 (2024). Link

Vannuscorps, G. When does imagery require motor resources? A commentary on Bach et al., 2022. Link

Nalborczyk, L., Longcamp, M., Gajdos, T. et al. Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022). Link

Our original article is here:

Bach, P., Frank, C., & Kunde, W. (2022). Why motor imagery is not really motoric: Towards a reconceptualization in terms of effect-based action control. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w. Publisher — PDF